Pages: [1] 2 |
1. [Proposal] PI enhancements - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Some of the more mentioned topics in SI and GD, but I didn't see them on the first 6 pages so I figured I'd bring them up... 1. Increase brightness/contrast of mineral scan overlay. - Presently if a material is in low concentrations it is very ...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2010.07.22 17:24:00
|
2. [Proposal] The Veldatar needs to join its son in Amarr - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Supported for chribba love, and veld violencing in Amarr.
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2009.07.20 20:13:00
|
3. Proposal - CCP to re-examine docking into capital ships - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Idea sounds pretty good--gives the carrier something to do besides rep towers all day.
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2009.07.20 20:09:00
|
4. Big 0.0 Revamp Thread - Incentivizing 0.0 and stuff - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Sounds good. 0.0 needs a buff. ----------------------------------------------- Hadean Drive Yards
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.12.29 18:16:00
|
5. Identical stats > identical name - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Vladimir Tinakin on 29/12/2008 18:15:19 Or, keep them separate, and allow search by item type and meta level. Problem solved. ----------------------------------------------- Hadean Drive Yards
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.12.29 18:15:00
|
6. Release the Moon Harvester 2 - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Vladimir Tinakin on 11/12/2008 20:08:10 T2 moon miners, if they work as previously described, would only help for deposits that have an abundance greater than 1. While this would help somewhat, I would venture to say most dyspro/pro...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.12.11 20:08:00
|
7. [idea] exportable/importable overview settings - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Vladimir Tinakin on 29/08/2008 20:17:15 Signed. ----------------------------------------------- Hadean Drive Yards
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.08.29 20:17:00
|
8. [Issue] Citadel Torpedoes - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Bump for relevance. Phoenixes lost out on another titan killmail...though it might have just melted that fast. :P ----------------------------------------------- Hadean Drive Yards
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.08.27 21:45:00
|
9. [Issue] make drones emergency warp - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Drones don't have warp drives. Fighters do. When you ewarp you go 1M km out, then when you relog/resync you turn around and warp 1M back. The drones would have to follow you in warp out and back for this to work. As much as I'd love ewarp reten...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.08.05 16:23:00
|
10. [Proposal] Remote bookmarking of scan results - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Supported, at least for exploration sigs, because cov ops have all the tank of a sodden tissue. And gas clouds suck. ----------------------------------------------- Hadean Drive Yards
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.08.04 15:51:00
|
11. Proposal: Kamekazi microdrones - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Well, wait...this idea has a few good extensions to it. You could make a specialized ejection module for these drones, maybe with cylindrical tubes with acceleration guides in them so they exit at velocity already. For faster time to target, you ...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.08.04 15:42:00
|
12. [Issue] Discuss Zulupark's carrier dev blog - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Soleil Fournier Edited by: Soleil Fournier on 31/07/2008 21:37:57 I will never support a change that takes fighters out of my own control. They're MY fighters, not my gangs. I trained for them, I bought them, I want to...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.07.31 22:13:00
|
13. [Issue] Discuss Zulupark's carrier dev blog - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Supported, at least as far as to have CCP readdress the situation. The current solution is less than optimal for numerous reasons; not the least of which is the lack of a focus for carriers. Dreads kill structures and non-nano'd capitals. (nanoti...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.07.31 15:47:00
|
14. [VOTE] All FOR The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Kill the nano! All for the nerf, although I do believe that careful balancing is needed for some of the aspects brought up in the blog. The levelling off of speed, however, is a no-brainer. ----------------------------------------------- Hadean ...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.07.26 16:30:00
|
15. [Issue] POS Modules and Citadel Torpedos - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
/signed I can see why some weapons arrays would be...less than optimally targeted by dreads (the "bring smaller ships into POS warfare" idea) but at the very least warp scramblers and large guns should be able to be attackable for a reasonably hi...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.07.26 16:28:00
|
16. Rethinking capital ships to be something special - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Ooh, here's one for you: To target subsystems, you need a signal scanning resolution of over, say, 400-500. So only frigates and sensor-boosted cruisers/battleships can make these precision shots. The damage would be inflicted on shields/armor a...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.07.24 21:58:00
|
17. [Issue] Empire Ores - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Pinkranger I believe in the invisible hand. problem with that is, this issue was created by CCP artificially by the nature of the drone region drops and other factors. That tritanium is so valuable IS the result of the...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.07.21 14:07:00
|
18. Why at least one caldari ship needs a bigger drone bay.. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
While I don't see this as a major issue--as mentioned, caldari are broken (in the bad way for them) in many worse ways--but I could see the scorpion getting some drone love since it has more of a utility role as it stands. Got my thumbs up, but I...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.07.21 13:59:00
|
19. [Issue] Citadel Torpedoes need help - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Vladimir Tinakin on 18/07/2008 15:56:28 Already a topic in the Hall on this, actually: Plus it was mentioned that the issue was being addressed/included in the "Capital Ships Online" CSM topic--though I can't say I've seen it ex...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.07.18 15:56:00
|
20. CRITICAL issue : the risk/reward balance of minerals and moonstuff - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Supported. As is being seen IRL with the price of gas, once something gets too pricey alternatives WILL be sought, or ones that were previously not cost effective put into use. So should it be with Eve. --------------------------------------------...
- by Vladimir Tinakin - at 2008.07.15 23:07:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |